Radio 4 has a programme which throws together random readings and slivers of music conducted by one of a number of men with striking voices, in the hope that we find it profound. It seems to be on at 6am and 11.30pm on a Sunday, when it is fairly easy to sound profound.

Yesterday was about spring, and the impact it has on emotions, and I was caught up short a) by his reference to May being the commonest time for suicide (I thought they were more evenly spread but I might be wrong - my memory is of someone attributing the period of Christmas as the most depressing period) and b) by the parsing of SAD as Seasonally-Adjusted Depression.

In seasonally-adjusting, do we not compensate for the factors that vary according to season, and so this would be the very opposite of SAD?

On the other hand, going in search of what precisely SAD stands for I found:

  • Sagittal Abdominal Diameter,
  • Schizoaffective disorder
  • Separation anxiety disorder
  • Sexual arousal disorder
  • Selected area diffraction
  • Social anxiety disorder
  • Standard American Diet


I think I suffer from several of these - although I don't think want to know this at 6.00 in the morning or 11.30 at night.
faustus: (gorilla)
( Feb. 27th, 2008 02:29 pm)
As expected, Ben Goldacre of Bad Science has written sensibly about anti-depression medication effectiveness - http://www.badscience.net/?p=619#more-619. As always it's not whether a drug works or not that is significant, rather that research which doesn't fit the pharmaceutical company's wishes doesn't get published whereas those that do, do. Edit: Well, if the drug works is an issue, but my understanding is that this is not what the study is about, rather it is about what funded research is published. Some of the medication appears to be more effective than placebos, but not *significantly* more effective. In other words, should the NHS spend on it or not?

They are many causes of depressive; some will be chemical, some will be experiential, some will be to do with working too much and not relaxing, some may be genetic, and probably each case will be a combination of the causes. The mistake is to assume that any pill will lead to instant gratification or that any therapy is nonsense. And then there are relapses as people come off pills because they feel okay again. It's not as if there are several of us, one to try drugs on, one to try CBT, another to leave alone to get better anyway. I know somne people who have had successful therpay and those who have failed. I know people whose medication has made them worse.

I would probably label myself as scientificly ignorant - but the standards of science journalism get lower and lower (although at least on the Toady Programme they warned people to keep taking the pills).
Follows on from here

I've been spending much of the last few days, maybe the last few weeks, going in and out of the shade. There's been promise of sun, but not as much as I'd hoped for, and some cloud has always come along unexpectedly. It's not the sun's fault. It's not necessarily the cloud's fault.

I'd been resigned to shade for October, even thinking that this was for the best. I'm treading on delicate ground here - I've been talking too much about the weather, to the wrong people. No, not the wrong people, but I can't really talk to anyone about the weather. I was asked though, and even prevarication is too far.

And now, unexpectedly, the sun is going to come out, in November mind, and I'm not at sure that this is what I will want. I keep on thinking, skin cancer.
Some days the sun shines, and you just bask in the glow, and all is right with the world. It's as if you are suddenly the centre of the universe, and everything is revolving around you.

And then, it passes. It is dark again. You feel sidelined. Overshadowed. Eclipsed, even. Everything seems heavy, and onerous, and too much trouble. But the worst thing is you remember the sunshine, and are torn between remembering it and counting the days until the next time.

Is it that the shadow is necessary to appreciate the sunshine? Or is the darkness the price to be paid? You can't have the light without the dark.

But sometimes I suspect I'm so dazzled when it is sunny, that the dark is darker because of the light. In fact, if you really analysed it properly, you'd find that the dark wasn't actually that dark at all, but seems so because you can remember the sunshine, and you know that isn't it.

I wish, I wish, I wish I were able to just console myself with remembering the sun when it has gone. Instead it feels all too often that the dark would be bearable if I didn't have the sun to compare it to.
.

Profile

faustus: (Default)
faustus

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags