Brief write-ups as two reviewed elsewhere

XXIX: Brian J. Robb, Counterfeit Worlds: Philip K. Dick on Film (London: Titan, 2006)
XXX: Jason Vest, Future Imperfect: Philip K. Dick at the Movies (New York: Praeger, 2007)


These two books dovetail nicely - Robb's an account of the making of the films from Blade Runner to (just) Next and Vest's a critique of the adaptations to Paycheck. Both include chapters on unofficial adaptations, Robb also includes early radio adaptations, abortive tv outlines and Total Recall: The Series (although not more recent radio plays). He's done a lot of synthesis - cut and paste is not quite fair - and I'd've preferred more academic apparatus in pinning his sources down. (He can point to my Pocket Essential - in his bibliography - and say the same. Hello Mr Kettle!)

Vest begins by noting the snootiness of some critics against films and film adaptation (which must be 90% of films) and argues that there are something like three masterpieces (Blade Runner, Minority Report and Scanner), one dud (Paycheck) and the rest are interesting near misses. I think he's unfair to Minority Report (it's nonsense) and Screamers (it's incredibly layered). Plus "Paycheck" ain't that great as a story. I also get the sense that he never gets sufficiently far from (untheorised) adaptation to see them as films as films. And he keeps coming back to speculating what Dick would think. He'd hate them. He'd love them. Whatever. Both at once even.

Oh, and Spielberg homages Hitchcock but Woo steals from him.

A passing note - I've speed read the Library of America apparatus on the Dick volume. Okay but thin.

XXXI: Nancy Springer, The White Hart (1979)
I know this is only part of the story, but this is the high fantasy forsooth and on my honour my liege which betimes tells the story of a woman of high birth, her cousin-intended (inheritance via sibling's son) and a god who has become a man. Some kind of war, some kind of deer running around being symbolic. I really slid off this.

Read because I need some female fantasy writers for a forthcoming chapter; Springer will not be one of them (although I had hopes of the symbolism of the white hart - is one of them a replicant?).
faustus: (gorilla)
( Jun. 17th, 2008 02:54 pm)
... reading The Cosmic Puppets just before going back to your home town is not such a good idea. Apparently I died of scarlet fever in 1988.
# 1,500


The Kafka allusions since I've returned to Kent are just an added bonus. Life's nice that way.
John Goodridge
“Palmer Eldritch”
Barry Atkins
Alberto Paulino
Andrew M. Butler

H'mmmm. Less surprising in Dick scholarship I suppose. The secret will be in the chairing

http://pkdday2atntu.webs.com/programmes.html
faustus: (lights)
( Jun. 12th, 2008 03:23 am)
I have converted an old paper (originally delivered at Leeds University January 1994 and clearly heavily cut down for this - http://www.alphane.com/moon/PalmTree/tomorrow.htm, an article I agreed to but was never told had appeared) into a new PowerPoint complete with pictures and covering two more novels, ready for Saturday. I do appear to have lost all the specific Jameson stuff (I once did something on PKD and pomo, but that file is lost, and the print out would be ... filed).

Of course, I'll need to to turn it back to an article at some point, but that can wait. There is all the PKD (the PhD) to get back to (particularly with fair use and a more hands-on estate in mind) of course.

Oh. It's 3.30am. It's raining. I need to be up for 10. This is not catching up with sleep.
faustus: (auton)
( May. 7th, 2007 04:37 pm)
Addenda Context: Some outfit called the Library of America have made a very safe choice of Dick's novels and have released them in an omnibus edition. I envisage this as Readers Digest, only full text. A service so you can keep up with the Zeitgeist. Whilst some people still say Dick's nothing more than a hack, other people are wetting themselves in the excitement that he has arrived! The release of Next is possibly to blame - I read one piece saying that Dick had written at least seven novels. I dreamt the thirty others then.

Now the mighty New York Times have written up a press release declared that Dick has arrived, which is news to us who have been somewhat aware that he's been here, albeit only after he died, aside from in France where they caught on by the mid-1970s. See here http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/06/books/06mcgr.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2&th&emc=th and reach for the cod.

I don't think the author of this piece shows any evidence of having read any PKD - maybe this review of Carrere http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0DE7DC1430F933A15755C0A9629C8B63&fta=y, but he trots out the cliches - drugs, FBI, many wives, misquotes the Ace Double Bible joke and says:

"So for the most part you don’t read Mr. Dick for his prose. (The main exception is “The Man in the High Castle,” his most sustained and most assured attempt at mainstream respectability, and it’s barely a sci-fi book at all but, rather, what we would now call a “counterfactual”; its premise is that the Allies lost World War II and the United States is ruled by the Japanese in the west and the Nazis in the east.) Nor do you read him for the science, the way you do, say, Isaac Asimov or Robert Heinlein."

Asimov on Science for the Science, maybe, but not the Foundation trilogy. Or any of it. And Alternate History would do nicely. (I suspect if you check the book it's Nazis in the south but I would swear to that)

Anyway, Patrick Nielsen-Hayden skewers it at Making Light (http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008949.html) and the description of the article as "writing whose main purpose is to explain to anxious readers whether it’s socially acceptable to like this stuff or not" is spot on to me.





So Dick is no longer neglected so that people can write things like this: http://books.monstersandcritics.com/news/article_1300681.php/Sci-Fi_writer_Philip_K._Dick_goes_from_neglected_to_accepted

Apparently the pubic is slow. The what?

Sheesh.

Dig deeper and you can find that [the person who summarised the NYT piece at Monsters and Critics admits]

"I did some interesting posts, one where I talk about Philip K. Dick's neglect as a writer, and mention James Emanuel. I've never actually read Philip K. Dick, (but I've heard good things) and I took it as a chance to speak about how the great artists rise and the mediocre fall away."
(http://jaschneider.blogspot.com/2007/05/monsters-critics-updates-general.html)

Unbuh-leavable.

I wonder where this "trolls and wackos" characterisation of his fans comes from? Sounds more like the people jumping on the bandwagon.
Some guy from the Asian Dub Foundation talks PKD on Radio 4's Breakfast programme, Today. I think Mark E Smith claims that Dick told him his was the only record he had (or had in 1979? The words are blurred). Yea, right.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/listenagain/ram/today3_dick_20070407.ram


(This link probably only valid until Monday unless someone records it...)
faustus: (auton)
( Jan. 30th, 2007 03:20 pm)
I was asked to update the Pocket Essential Philip K Dick* to mark the 25 anniversary of his death, and this came along when I was deepest in The Big Project - which I've barely touched since new year - the degree rewrite and the readership application (and was itching really to edit The Four Loons). I was painfully aware that the final novel, Voices from the Street was due for publication round about late January, and that I risked being out of date (and wrong). I finally got hold of a copy late last week, found corners of the weekend to read it in, and have written an entry on it. Today I went through the proofs, and hopefully that will be that. Whether they can still hit a March 2 (or even a 22 February) publication date remains to be seen, but I'd better get dressed at last and go into town.

* Now available from Bromley and Son for only £42.25! Or, $399.98
(+ $3.49 shipping) from hannahsmiley. Support these fine people!
faustus: (auton)
( Dec. 21st, 2006 10:28 am)
"The next time you beat your keyboard in frustration, think of a day when it may be able to sue you for assault. Within 50 years we might even find ourselves standing next to the next generation of vacuum cleaners in the voting booth."

“If granted full rights, states will be obligated to provide full social benefits to [robots] including income support, housing and possibly robo-healthcare to fix the machines over time.”
Tags:
.

Profile

faustus: (Default)
faustus

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags