And so a long term comes to an end, a term dominated by marking and more arguments over marks and extensions than I can remember, with many of those arising from students I have been generous to. I don't think I've been any harsher than normal, but entitlement is all over the place. I feel micromanaged, second guessed and undermined.

Perhaps the study leave around the corner has caused an exhaustion to emerge, as I weigh up the urge to get on with the need to take time out. But there are still jobs to do:


  • Write resit questions
  • Comment on module questionnaires
  • Deal with annual reports for doctoral students
  • Comment on two dissertations
  • Mark essay which has been resubmitted
  • Mark essay from student given long extension
  • Check and if necessary mark essay from student who had mitigating circumstances
  • See doctoral student in London


Is the word I'm searching for asymtopic? Jobs left to do tend towards zero, but never reach it?
faustus: (Angry)
( Mar. 22nd, 2010 06:18 pm)
The last week or two has been a death march - plans of daily reading and viewing took second place to marking and second marking, and I've been trying to finish for ages. But the late essays had issues that needed checking - although they weren't in the end all problems after all - and there were some waifs and strays of late hand ins which we awaited more in hope than anticipation. It's the sort of period that for every two you mark, another one is found to take their place.

And then you start moving the pile from work, to home, to the coffee bar, to home, to work, to the pub, to home, to the cinema, hoping you'll find that stray twenty minutes before you realise you need Google to mark with.

The end stays out of reach.

Today I think I did it - the horror essay from January, the two last first year problems. And there was a new lecture to deliver today. Is that it?

I have lost two Saturdays and two or three other days to sleep - perhaps a sign of running on empty, perhaps a result of too many 2.30 bedtimes, too many, let's mark just one mores...

And just around the corner, study leave, but am I ready for that? It that not sprinting onto a motorway?

I had a grand plan of getting the Gold Megarider, and spending a week on buses, dropping in on local towns. But I have a year-end interview. And I need to see a PhD student in London. And Easter buggers the buses. I need four days of the seven to make it worthwhile. Can it be done?

And then the realisation of the two long term extensions, the essays due in April...

The death march never ends...
faustus: (Culture)
( Mar. 15th, 2010 12:08 am)
I just marked two essays for the same module - these were left over from a divvying up to co-workers, and there's another ten or so which were late which I won't burn the midnight oil over. Both of them had sentences I wanted to type into Google and I'm not sure I've much to teach either. But one of them is as high a first as I dare and one is as close to a fail as I dare go without having to do paperwork. I see bright things ahead for one of them.
faustus: (Comedy)
( Mar. 14th, 2010 07:49 pm)
There was a plan - for lo! we do not do things randomly round here. But the trip to London on Friday was more exhausting than planned - or perhaps the journey home was - and thus the Saturday morning writing a lecture in the library turned into hitting the radio button on the alarm clock every seventy minutes or so. I emerged at four from bed (I did hear the play with Nighy and Glenister), and turned my hand to the lecture at about seven, and tried for an early night.

Sunday was meant to be about marking the delinquents and seeing a film - but I failed to lie in so started a big tidy in the morning before going to the campus on the hill. Except their coffee bar doesn't open until forty minutes before the film, and I didn't get the marking started, though sorted the essay questions for one module at last.

And so back home to add pictures to the lectures, and mark - but somehow I saved the version cut down to notes over the version I'd started adding pictures to. Fortunately I sent a copy to my co-teachers and retrieved this - so now I have to phone home and then mark. I don't think I'm getting Return of the Jedi watched tonight as planned.
faustus: (cinema)
( Nov. 16th, 2009 12:43 am)
Tonight, after a weekend of prevarication, I marked a batch of essays.

Students are their own worst enemies - increasing numbers are printing out single space and (I'm not sure why this annoys me but it does) on both sides of the paper. Italicising film titles (like I do on the lecture slides) seems to be out, save for where it is also in quotation marks, and those students who also italicise every quotation, date and reference irrespective of the source or its need to be italicised.

Too many of them are simply writing about a film (although at least aren't just summarizing the plot) as if the question I've set is just for the sake of my health. Which clearly it isn't. If the question is on the sublime, cognition, estrangement, define these terms. Maybe even use them occasionally.

Given the library resources (an atrium big enough to house 94 double decker buses) it is hardly surprising that dead tree references are rarer then hen's teeth, but despite precise instructions Kuhn and Redmond tend to be quoted rather than Bukatman or Sontag who wrote that chapter. If any of the students - notice that word there, any - had come to see me, I might have been able to point them towards the secondary literature on Blade Runner, The Matrix, Dark City. Some of it is on JSTOR.

And a special prize to a student whose six quotations were all taken from the lecture, despite all being from sources readily available on line thanks to Google or Gutenberg.
faustus: (Default)
( Jun. 5th, 2009 04:12 pm)
I get the faint sense that there is a sense of humour deficit on the interwebs - either in my jokes or their audience. I reckon it's the latter.

Meanwhile, this morning I marked precisely two essays on the pile - the first of which was the kind of plagiarism which doesn't count because most of the sources are in the essay and in fact the whole damn thing is three quotes. The second - I kid you not - was also borderline, in the sense of long quotes and plentiful paraphrases.


I note in passing no one else has spotted plagiarism on this module.

Marked scripts in the exam - when I wasn't escorting the early leavers from the room. Plenty resits, methinks. Many of the scripts bear a FEEDBACK HELPS ME LEARN. Does it buggery? So why am I still marking incorrect bibliographies in level three? Why do they italicise quotations and not film titles? Why are people's names in quotations?

I shall take the pile of portfolios to Caffe Nerd, in the hope of an hour or so uninterrupted marking. Heigho.
faustus: (Default)
( May. 26th, 2009 03:23 pm)
Today's highlight was noticing that a student had written down the manufacturer of my Tshirt. I is kewl.

Apparently.

Aside from that I have the grumpiness which comes from shifting around too many bits of paper and marking, and taking stuff to and from work without them getting more marked. Into this, slot a period of peripetititiary, and decisions about what I can risk marking in trasit.


Time is squeezed.

For someone's convenience I was to meet to hand marking across on a particular day - now they want to move that forward, but that was the day I planned to do the marking on. Take it home now to bring back to do on Monday? Students are chaffing for work back. They can wait. The self-scanner took ten minutes to issue my library books. Don't get me started on Boots/Tescos.

Fifty small pieces of reach are being torn up.

And if your bookshop have several large signs telling me to leave my bag at the till, why are you looking so surprised when I do?


But at least I have a paper and a print out of a paper. A plug converter. And bought a battery charger after weeks months of not doing so (I do have two somewhere already). And bit and pieces of food for a train journey.


Sometimes, I am seven:

Pope's Passage

faustus: (coffee)
( May. 20th, 2009 10:57 am)
I plan to take Friday off. This translates as I will go to the library at the campus on the hill, and research the Leuven paper.


I wonder if I'd have time to go up to W afterwards? Look at the sea.


Marking mountains surround or beckon, with another absence to deal with next week - some can go to Leuven, I guess. And I need a real not-working day this weekend. Does watching The Man who Fell to Earth count as not working? Maybe I should go to Deal on Saturday. Need more Cafe Nerds in the area. Or I could try Lewes or Eastbourne. Engineering works? Place your bets. Ashford? Yawn. Do the Medway towns (Rochester for Baggins, Rainham for a couple more, maybe try Gillingham). Too much book shopping. And been there. Back to Hastings - save Rye for the book sale in July.
faustus: (gorilla)
( May. 17th, 2008 08:18 pm)
Then you get the essay which is stuffed to the gills with quotations - indeed you plan to made a note of some of them yourself for future reference (but probably won't get round to it). The referencing system is a little to pot, but still, there's the festure in that direction.

Alas, the essay is 2,500 words, but only about 150 of them are by the student. The rest is quotation. Each paragraph is a quotation, with an occasional comment by the student. And then a paragraph at the end claiming to have prven something when in fact I've just been shown the evidence at random.

A fail, I fear. A hardworking student, but did the wrong job. *Sigh*
faustus: (gorilla)
( May. 17th, 2008 02:11 pm)
Can any access science.jrank.org/pages/8077/Sexuality.html - my modem won't let me, although a similar page demands payment (http://www.mywire.com/pubs/NewDictionaryOfHistoryOfIdeas/2005/10/25/1130757?&pbl=222)

It looks like it is an essay by Jeffery Weeks and includes the phrases "When we think of sexuality, we think of many different things. We think of reproduction, we think of pleasure, we think of love, we think of potential diseases,so finally the concept of sexuality has many multiplicity of meanings."


Googling so far has reconstructed:

"When we think of sexuality, we think of many different things. We think of reproduction and the different bodies and reproductive capacities of men and women. We think of pleasure, the pleasures of the body, but also the pains, mental and physical, that can wrack the body. We think of love, and the joys of human human involvement, but we might also remember the fear and hate that sexuality can evoke — through discrimination, prejudice, abuse, violence, rape. We think of potential diseases, of which HIV/AIDS has become the most potent symbol, and the possibility of death, which has always dogged sexual activity"

Not quite plagiarism,but I want to find that "multiplicity" [sic?]
Tags:
I have watched the end of Herbie Fully-Loaded

I have bought a packet of chocolate hobnobs.

The packet is half gone.
faustus: (gorilla)
( Apr. 10th, 2008 02:16 am)
"Spielberg is a notorious film director."

"Hitchcock is an infamous director."

To me, Al Capone was notorious, Jack the Ripper was infanous.

OK, Spielberg is a notoriously sentimental director whose films reunite fractured families, Hitchcock was infamous for the way he treated actresses. But that's not what they mean in their essays.

Fatty Arbuckle, maybe he was notorious. All sorts of scandal about him. Mostly slander, mind. And maybe Ed Wood Jr or William Castle were infamous.

But at some point these words have come to mean well-known.
faustus: (culture)
( Apr. 16th, 2007 07:09 pm)
"John Carpenter was well known for scouring his films."

(I thought that was Stan Brakhage)


"As the music climaxes, the cameras cut to a sandy dessert."

H'mmm. Banana Split. Apple Pie.


Wait for it... )

"Dracula is a film that has been created by Stoker to allow him to put forward not only his ideas that he has researched but his frustrations that he has found in the society that he lives in and rebels against.
"Bram Stoker lived in the Victorian era, his work seems way ahead of his time when considering femininity, however he was amongst those such as Jane Austen and Emily Bronte, who could be described as those who began the movement of feminism. Bram Stoker can be counted as a feminist due to his extremely influential work, Dracula, because women have been shown as much more dominant than the male characters."

"The blood which the vampires drink can also be seen as seamen."

"Buffy goes around seducing all her victims and luring them into her trap so they die and became vampires just like her."
.

Profile

faustus: (Default)
faustus

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags