I use to know how to use apostrophes, but after two decades of marking (two decades' marking?) I've lost the sense of flavour.

Take this:

  • "1970s gender expectations"


The author suggests an apostrophe, but I think they want:

  • "1970's gender expectations"


but we're not just talking about 1970 - which pedants might argue isn't actually in the 1970s - we're talking about the whole decade:

  • "1970s' gender expectations"


which looks a little wrong, and since I suspect the 1970s is singular rather than plural, a case might be made for:

  • "1970s's gender expectations"


which is horrible. As far as I can make out from Fowler II, "1970s" is treated an adjectival noun, and thus doesn't necessarily need one.

  • "1970s gender expectations"


may do, after all. It doesn't help that I need an MLA styleguide for this - assuming it answers such a question.

I could just rewrite:

  • "gender expectations of the 1970s"
faustus: (gorilla)
( Aug. 29th, 2007 09:05 pm)
Is there some rule which that governs the use of "that" and "which" "that" "which" (dammit), that says that "that" is the word that is to be used rather than "which"?

I have a horrible feeling that someone might mention intrangient verbs to me. Or something.
.

Profile

faustus: (Default)
faustus

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags