I use to know how to use apostrophes, but after two decades of marking (two decades' marking?) I've lost the sense of flavour.
Take this:
The author suggests an apostrophe, but I think they want:
but we're not just talking about 1970 - which pedants might argue isn't actually in the 1970s - we're talking about the whole decade:
which looks a little wrong, and since I suspect the 1970s is singular rather than plural, a case might be made for:
which is horrible. As far as I can make out from Fowler II, "1970s" is treated an adjectival noun, and thus doesn't necessarily need one.
may do, after all. It doesn't help that I need an MLA styleguide for this - assuming it answers such a question.
I could just rewrite:
Take this:
- "1970s gender expectations"
The author suggests an apostrophe, but I think they want:
- "1970's gender expectations"
but we're not just talking about 1970 - which pedants might argue isn't actually in the 1970s - we're talking about the whole decade:
- "1970s' gender expectations"
which looks a little wrong, and since I suspect the 1970s is singular rather than plural, a case might be made for:
- "1970s's gender expectations"
which is horrible. As far as I can make out from Fowler II, "1970s" is treated an adjectival noun, and thus doesn't necessarily need one.
- "1970s gender expectations"
may do, after all. It doesn't help that I need an MLA styleguide for this - assuming it answers such a question.
I could just rewrite:
- "gender expectations of the 1970s"
Tags: