So last night, whilst insufficiently binge-drinking, I was reflecting on the role of programme leader and how at some point I as likely to have to take the role on again. I'm not convinced that timetabling, checking registers, and giving extensions are academic jobs, or, if we are being paid to teach and research, I don't think it's an effective use of resources. (I leave to one side the notion that a third of our time is thought to be administration.) In addition to this the logic of whatever DRAM is called now - devolving the visibility of budgets as far down the foodchain as possible, and at Bucks that was meant to be the programme before they hastily retreated - it might include number crunching. In return for this, you are given teaching remission equivalent to one day a week. My theory is that I would therefore only spend a day a week doing so.
As I said last night, if I wanted a job where I had to take work home and work in the evenings and weekends, I would have become an accountant like my dad.
As I said last night, if I wanted a job where I had to take work home and work in the evenings and weekends, I would have become an accountant like my dad.
Tags:
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(Answer to your question appears to be the sequence of the lights, btw.)
From:
no subject
The flashing amber light seemed to me to be the only distinguishing feature from the motorist's point of view (I'm not convinced you'd be able to tell if it was wider than your memory of pelican crossings was).
On the other hand, if there are pedestrians on the crossing and no flashing amber light, I'm guessing you are still meant to give way?
Pegasus is for horses.
Then there are Puffins (and a question about Toucans did come up in her test).