faustus: (auton)
faustus ([personal profile] faustus) wrote2007-02-13 11:24 am
Entry tags:

Apparently It Is a Word

De-duplicate.

"In order to de-duplicate effort and to ensure that we offer the best experience to all our users, the old telephone directory has been removed."

[identity profile] ticking-fool.livejournal.com 2007-02-13 01:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Somebody, somewhere, has to suffer for that.

[identity profile] drasecretcampus.livejournal.com 2007-02-13 01:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I know language isn't fixed but this is so double plus ungood.

[identity profile] bookzombie.livejournal.com 2007-02-13 02:02 pm (UTC)(link)
De-duplicate is certainly a word in my industry. It's used to describe the process of removing duplicate entries - for example if you have recorded a customer twice under similar addresses and you want to make sure that all orders point to one of the customers.

But in the context you have it here - that's just wrong!

[identity profile] drasecretcampus.livejournal.com 2007-02-13 03:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I can see that - but remove duplicate records would be less ugly! The example I give is even less elegant.

[identity profile] bookzombie.livejournal.com 2007-02-14 10:22 am (UTC)(link)
What you have to bear in mind that in my context this is technical terminology, not English; think of it as an engineering term.

It's not a new coinage, by the way, it's been around for the whole 20 plus years I've been working in IT.

It should never be used in an non-technical context, though!

[identity profile] drasecretcampus.livejournal.com 2007-02-14 10:29 am (UTC)(link)
That's fair enough. It hasn't made it into Chambers yet though.

People make much the same comments about - say - concretisation, sytagmatic and so forth in LitCrit. That too is technical talk, and not (necessarily) aimed at outsiders.

I don't think I'd object to reduplicate, mind. Deduplicate sounds too much like a stutter to me.