![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
A quick query - on representing the other, widely defined. Actually, not so quick, as it keeps bashing into binaries of power which are not-so-binary when it comes to practise; the ideology is either/or, the practice is sometimes both/and.
We must all be familiar with criticism which is aware of absences, usually with a small-p political agenda - where are all the women in The Dark Knight, where are all the Africa Americas in Friends or Afro-Caribbeans in Notting Hill? I've just read a swathe of 1970s sf in search of homosexuality - and largely found bisexuals and forms of transgendered people, but next to no gays.
It is as every character in fiction is white, male, heterosexual, and of course the market is structured that white, male heterosexuals have easier access to it. (I'm stating this as a fact - the white, male heterosexual plot to take over the world...)
Equally we can all cite those embarrassing examples when authors have got it wrong - the African American with that sense of rhythm, the woman who keeps looking at her breasts, the gay who likes show tunes and dreams of Dorothy.
Given how many men there are in the media, I suspect it is easier for women to create convincing men then vice versa. My hunch from the suspicion is that holds for ethnicity, sexuality, handedness, age, and so forth. This thought is prompted in part by the passionate discussion and argument elsewhere in the virtual realm - but it's nothing I haven't pondered about before.
I'll boil the question down to the concrete, because I don't want to be tangled up in dominant/normal/majority/privilege as terms, although I'm sure you'd know what I mean.
Should men try to depict women - however badly - rather than ignore them?
Should white people try to depict People of Colour, rather than an all-white society?
Should heterosexuals try to depict other sexualities, or assume heteronormativity?
Your bonus: how legitimate is it to use one class of representing the "other" as a metaphor or allegory for another?
ETA: I've just marked an essay citing bell hooks and Stuart Hall on white privilege. Heigho. I've also modified the first question to parallel the syntax more.
I suspect behind the bonus question is both a) the use of aliens as metaphor for otherness and b) the identificatory reading strategies one might have to use having not found a proxy for yourself in the text (which might lead one to say, "I'm not x but I am y, so I understand your pain.")
We must all be familiar with criticism which is aware of absences, usually with a small-p political agenda - where are all the women in The Dark Knight, where are all the Africa Americas in Friends or Afro-Caribbeans in Notting Hill? I've just read a swathe of 1970s sf in search of homosexuality - and largely found bisexuals and forms of transgendered people, but next to no gays.
It is as every character in fiction is white, male, heterosexual, and of course the market is structured that white, male heterosexuals have easier access to it. (I'm stating this as a fact - the white, male heterosexual plot to take over the world...)
Equally we can all cite those embarrassing examples when authors have got it wrong - the African American with that sense of rhythm, the woman who keeps looking at her breasts, the gay who likes show tunes and dreams of Dorothy.
Given how many men there are in the media, I suspect it is easier for women to create convincing men then vice versa. My hunch from the suspicion is that holds for ethnicity, sexuality, handedness, age, and so forth. This thought is prompted in part by the passionate discussion and argument elsewhere in the virtual realm - but it's nothing I haven't pondered about before.
I'll boil the question down to the concrete, because I don't want to be tangled up in dominant/normal/majority/privilege as terms, although I'm sure you'd know what I mean.
Should men try to depict women - however badly - rather than ignore them?
Should white people try to depict People of Colour, rather than an all-white society?
Should heterosexuals try to depict other sexualities, or assume heteronormativity?
Your bonus: how legitimate is it to use one class of representing the "other" as a metaphor or allegory for another?
ETA: I've just marked an essay citing bell hooks and Stuart Hall on white privilege. Heigho. I've also modified the first question to parallel the syntax more.
I suspect behind the bonus question is both a) the use of aliens as metaphor for otherness and b) the identificatory reading strategies one might have to use having not found a proxy for yourself in the text (which might lead one to say, "I'm not x but I am y, so I understand your pain.")
Tags:
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
From:
no subject
Easier in the sense of lifestyles are more comfortable in terms of sexuality or ethnicity, or easier in the sense of [someone's?] definitions allow sexuality to be a spectrum but ethnicity is er... either/or. (As someone said last week, "Immigration is not a black and white issue.) Whilst individuals might have a fraction of heritage a in their family tree, they are defined by fraction b? Or easy in the sense of being able to choose sexuality, but having ethnicity chosen for you?
Bonus entanglement: but is it all about definition and self-definition?
Theoretically it should be about self-definition - it's only polite to allow someone to identify as -------. But then I think of the white kids I know who speak in Jamaican accents and wonder.
Bonus offer: I'll shut up now.
Please don't.
From:
no subject
I am increasingly tempted to send off for one of those Genetic Assay thingies, because I have peculiar ancestry and would like it unpicked. That ancestry doesn't have much to do with how I define myself (which is by fraction (a), Mostly Caucasian), but it is part of me, physically at least.
See? Not shutting up :)