I turned the radio on on Monday night to KaleidoscopeFront Row to hear the unmistakeable tones of Mark Lawson asking Mark Billingham how much of something was true and how much was made up.
Argh!
Last night it was going to be Mark Lawson interviews J.G. Ballard "who has sifted the truth from the fiction in a new autobiography."
Argh!
Why shouldn't the made up be the truth?
"It's the truth even if it didn't happen."
[And Ballard was interviewed by James Naughtie on the Toady Programme last week, an interview uninforming even by Ballard's standards, not giving him a chance even to trot out the same lines he always uses:
JN: "So, you wrote a book about your experiences in Shanghai?"
JGB: "Yes, I did."
JN: "And Spielberg film it, in a most remarkable movie."
JGB: "Yes, he did."
No mention of sf, naturally, no indication that Naughtie had even read the books.]
So which bits of this post are the truth and which bits made up?
Argh!
Last night it was going to be Mark Lawson interviews J.G. Ballard "who has sifted the truth from the fiction in a new autobiography."
Argh!
Why shouldn't the made up be the truth?
"It's the truth even if it didn't happen."
[And Ballard was interviewed by James Naughtie on the Toady Programme last week, an interview uninforming even by Ballard's standards, not giving him a chance even to trot out the same lines he always uses:
JN: "So, you wrote a book about your experiences in Shanghai?"
JGB: "Yes, I did."
JN: "And Spielberg film it, in a most remarkable movie."
JGB: "Yes, he did."
No mention of sf, naturally, no indication that Naughtie had even read the books.]
So which bits of this post are the truth and which bits made up?
Tags: